Urth Net

← back to the conversation

interview questions

Ryan Dunn · 26 Dec 2010, 03:58 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: ryan at liftingfaces.com (Ryan Dunn)
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:58:04 -0500
Subject: (urth) interview questions
In-Reply-To: <4D16BC72.9070400 at gmail.com>
References: <30174.89037.qm at web58204.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
	<8E25C17A-871A-41CC-B9B2-0FCBFA19E96E at liftingfaces.com>
	<4D16BC72.9070400 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1C16EF8A-3F07-4C28-AD4F-A0024901AFC5 at liftingfaces.com>

Understood. Still, anyone who's read the Gevers interview from 2002 would probably agree that the aggressiveness with which he pursues answers to mysteries is nothing if not off-putting.

...ryan


On Dec 25, 2010, at 10:54 PM, James Wynn wrote:

> 
> It's worth noting that this list was at the time of that interview in heated debate over Marc's theories about Blushas or Grushas. Marc had posted on a communication he had had with Wolfe about his Blushas theory in which Wolfe had replied "No! Urth is Green!" Gevers had contacted Wolfe for a more elaborate explanation and Wolfe's reply was that he was joking and "Sometimes, I should just keep my mouth shut." Additionally, it had been pointed out that the Blue/Green planet combination was a reoccurring trope and that St. Anne had also had intelligent trees and fairyland-like natives.
> 
> So, I can see that he saw himself as a representative of the Urth-listers in this interview and saw the question as one that needed to be asked.
> 
> u+16b9
> 
>> Ryan Dunn-
>> More specifically, the interviewer (Gevers) is not actually interested in Wolfe as a human being and accomplished writer, he is interested in Gene as a decoder ring for books he liked. It's wildly missing the point. To be in the presence of a great author, and only be trying to desperately "go for broke" to get answers to intentional mysteries is more than disrespectful, it's achingly naive.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net