Fish and Caves

António Pedro Marques · 29 Dec 2010, 22:36 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 22:36:25 +0000
Subject: (urth) Fish and Caves
In-Reply-To: <B01BB3EFEB954E159E18DBED9AFAAE71@jill>
References: <SNT123-W146E587ED1F3035CA74E11CF1D0 at phx.gbl>
	<B01BB3EFEB954E159E18DBED9AFAAE71@jill>
Message-ID: <4D1BB7E9.8090002 at gmail.com>

Gerry Quinn wrote (29-12-2010 21:17):
> I have said that some possible interpretations of parts of the book must
> be wrong. I wouldn't have thought that would be very controversial.

Then again, isn't it? What's the meaning of 'wrong' in this context?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net