Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Fish and Caves

Lee Berman · 29 Dec 2010, 23:17 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 18:17:33 -0500
Subject: (urth) Fish and Caves
Message-ID: <SNT123-W5C1915CECA716B5991300CF020 at phx.gbl>



>Gerry Quinn: Where do I suggest that parts of the book are meaningless?  I have said that 
>some possible interpretations of parts of the book must be wrong.  I wouldn't have thought 
>that would be very controversial.

Seems like almost all you do is assert that various interpretations of the book must be wrong. If
we follow that trajectory, all interpretations are wrong and the book is meaningless. Gets
a bit tiresome.
 
How about a change of pace? Leave out all mentions of the "wrong" and discuss what you, Gerry 
Quinn, think is the right interpretation. It would be refreshing to hear something positive
from you. Antechamber=spaceship was good. More, more! 		 	   		  

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net