Urth Net

← back to the conversation

interview questions

Lee Berman · 30 Dec 2010, 00:43 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:43:15 -0500
Subject: (urth) interview questions
Message-ID: <SNT123-W62D22A69FEB0AC44CC8D6CCF030 at phx.gbl>



>Son O' Witz: No Lee, it doesn't indicate the veracity of the Bible.
>It does *potentially* indicate a deluge drowning an older civilization, 
>but there are hundreds of Deluge Myths, why single out The Bible?  Why not 
>the babylonian myths?
 
Why not one of the 100+ Flood myths listed at this site: 
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/flood-myths.html
 
Gerry's question was answered at the level in which it was asked.
 
Ruins found beneath a body of water, whether on earth or in fiction, mean either 
that there was a Flood or that it was a mermaid city or that somebody went
through a lot of trouble to yank your chain with fake evidence of a flood. 		 	   		  

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net