Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Wolfe and Gaiman

Stuart Hamm · 02 Jan 2011, 22:15 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: hammstu at sbcglobal.net (Stuart Hamm)
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 14:15:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject: (urth) Wolfe and Gaiman
In-Reply-To: <370928.2243.qm at web37604.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <553051.35277.qm at web81408.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Maybe he likes Gaiman's sense of humor...Have you read "A Walking Tour Of The Shambles:? It's pretty funny......

???????? ? ? 
?
STUHAMM.COM
FACEBOOK/STUARTHAMM
myspace.com/stuhamm
Skype?? stuart.hamm
? ?? 


--- On Sun, 1/2/11, Craig Brewer <cnbrewer at yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Craig Brewer <cnbrewer at yahoo.com>
Subject: (urth) Wolfe and Gaiman
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Date: Sunday, January 2, 2011, 1:34 PM

I have a very general question that I hope people don't mind me just throwing 
out there. I've finally gotten around to reading Neil Gaiman (Sandman and his 
non-comics stuff) after years of only knowing him by reputation/summary. But the 
mutual praise between Wolfe and Gaiman always made me think that he had to be 
more interesting than I suspected he might be. So now, after reading quite a 
bit, I can say that I enjoy his stuff, but it's such a different experience from 
Wolfe that I really wonder why these two so often link themselves with each 
other.

I think the main thing that amazes me is that, while both deal with a kind of 
"deep mythology" attitude toward sf/fantasy, Gaiman's procedure is very 
straightforward and fable-like while Wolfe's is so much more oblique. Of course, 
they don't have to be doing the same thing to respect each other...but I just 
feel like I see many more differences than similarities when I read Gaiman.

So am I dense? Does anyone else have some better insight into their relationship 
(personal, professional, stylistic, thematic, or otherwise) or have a more 
articulate (and interesting) way to compare them? I think this is probably a 
situation where I want to see what Wolfe sees in Gaiman, but I'm not entirely 
sure that I do.



? ? ? 
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20110102/79a961b2/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net