Future reading group

Patri10629 · 19 Aug 1997, 09:42 · from urth-v0004.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Patri10629 at aol.com
Subject: (urth) Re:Future reading group
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 09:42:02
Message-ID: <urth-v0004-0250 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0004/0250.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[Posted from URTH, a mailing list about Gene Wolfe's New Sun and other work=
s]

In a message dated 8/19/97 3:40:56 AM, you wrote:

<<
But what if, instead of starting new groups devoted to Simmons, C. Smith,
etc., we became a kind of reading forum (if that doesn't sound too
bourgeois)? We're a self-selected group, we're obviously working pretty
well together, why don't we just throw it open for a while to a variety of
literary topics? The people who think they're not interested in Smith or
Simmons could either lurk for a while or get and read the books and pitch
in. A single book could be considered. It seems to me, for instance, that
most Wolfeans would get a thrill from A.S. Byatt's Possession and Peter
Hoeg's Smilla's Sense of Snow, puzzle books  with a strong sense of genre,
but published in the mainstream.=20

-alga->>

Sounds cool to me.

Patrick

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net