interview question

Jeff Wilson · 04 Jan 2011, 05:36 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jwilson at io.com (Jeff Wilson)
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:36:59 -0600
Subject: (urth) interview question
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W49DA5CE8571A489BFB3F48CF080 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W49DA5CE8571A489BFB3F48CF080 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <4D22B1FB.3060201 at io.com>

On 1/3/2011 9:23 PM, Lee Berman wrote:
>
>
>> Gerry Quinn: It's not at all inexplicable.  He thinks of Dollo's Law in the context of
>> his handwriting, specifically his thumb, which he cannot use; he must hold
>> the pen between his fingers with his thumb unused.  He is in the same
>> situation a human would be if humans evolved to no longer need thumbs, and
>> the thumb, or the neural networks controlling it, withered away.
>
> Gerry I'm in need of further explanation to understand your theory. You are implying
> an abo once had a thumb but evolved to not need one, then rediscovered the need while
> imitating Dr. Marsch? Why did abos once have a thumb then lose the need for it?
>
> And, of course, the obvious question: why does an Abo know about an obscure evolutionary
> principle postulated by some Belgian guy on earth in 1890 and connect it to his handwriting?
> Sound more like something an anthropologist would know about. If a minute portion of the
> brain's wiring can be imitated surely a thumb can be. Seem to be serious doubt over whether
> Dr. Marsch really has been replaced. There are a lot of cats about. Perhaps one bit his hand. 		 	   		

I'm still a little hazy on the Dollo's Law thing. Why is it relevant wrt 
to abo's shape-shifting within a single generation?  If it *is* 
relevant, why can't the new adaptation work just as well as the old, 
like cetacean fatty dorsal fins vs the piscine skeletal ones?

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
Computational Intelligence Laboratory - Texas A&M Texarkana
< http://www.tamut.edu/CIL >

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net