interview questions

Gerry Quinn · 06 Jan 2011, 19:22 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerryq at indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 19:22:49 -0000
Subject: (urth) interview questions
References: <AANLkTik9_qu9xBNtKP3N+E9fm7ZLbm0fK65i1Q2Th1E6 at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9EF2DE5F6C2E44728104D54DC4ED67C0@jill>


From: "Tony Ellis" <tonyellis69 at btopenworld.com>
> Gerry Quinn wrote:

[ I got caught up in my little story and failed to respond to the rest of 
your post about timelines.]

> "We came here either recently or long, long ago," the Old Wise One
> says. But if it's recently there are all sorts of problems, not least
> the fact that no one knew this star system existed until the French
> 'discovered' it. There's no helpful reference in VRT to an earlier
> expedition, or a lost spaceship. In any case, later the OWO says that
> his race have remained undisturbed here "for the longest time." And
> even if the Shadow Children are human, they still need time to
> degenerate into runty, round-eared pygmies.

Given the planetary colonisation wars between Earth nations and the absence 
of direct communication with Earth, a lost spaceship is no stretch.

A hundred years is a long time by some measures; it's certainly long enough 
to start taking a poison drug that stunts your growth (and perhaps has 
epigenetic effects).


> Then there is Dollo's Law. VRT cites it as an explanation for why he
> cannot hold a pen properly. But Dollo's Law requires an organ to
> "degenerate through evolution" - not something that happens over
> night. Whether you believe him or not, he is saying 'my ancestors
> haven't used tools for millennia'.

He doesn't cite it as a cause.  He mentions it.  I believe he is making an 
analogy rather than an explanation.


> There are other allusions to this. Marsch understands the Annese to be
> a race so similar to mankind "that they might almost have been the
> descendants of an earlier wave of colonisation," and goes on to muse
> about the odd similarity of the flora and fauna to terrestrial types.
>
> His speculation echoes precisely what Number 5 implausibly says in the
> first novella, that "it is distinctly possible that the aborigines of
> St Anne were descendants of some earlier wave of human expansion." A
> million-to-one coincidence? I don't think so.

I think this is better thought of in terms of a literary game than a 
million-to-one coincidence of thought between Marsch and Number Five. 
Either way, it's implausible, in my opinion.  (And he does give a tentative 
explanation for the wildlife in terms of parallel evolution.)


> ...As for the rest of your points, my rebuttals would mostly be
> variations on what I've already said. The thing we can't seem to get
> past is whether or not the Old Wise One is fantasising when he speaks
> of being human. We read it differently and there I think the matter
> has to rest. Lee asked my reasons for preferring one theory and I've
> given them, probably in more detail than anybody wanted :-)
>
> The next time I read 5HoC (overdue) I will make a sincere attempt to
> see the Shadow Children as humans, and see if that solves any of the
> other mysteries for me.

Maybe my 'timeline' will make the idea more plausible to you.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net