Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Another (Possibly Weak) Theory

DAVID STOCKHOFF · 06 Jan 2011, 22:09 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (DAVID STOCKHOFF)
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:09:36 -0800 (PST)
Subject: (urth) Another (Possibly Weak) Theory
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=N6DdvhaVXN7PD=+BnT34ejFz0H+6Xqd7CP=qL at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <71363.60608.qm at web84103.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Oh, no problem. I am very much on the fence and can't keep abos and Shadow Children straight any more than I can keep the various Hiero-dudes straight.
I'd note that "racial memory" memes once were very popular and seem to be indirectly played on here---someone mentioned the Dogons. Also, Sandwalker always reminded me of an Australian aborigine, so the Dreamtime (very long time ago) is not a stretch ?for me. And Australian aborigines came from Africa as much as India.?Fairies are often pale and blond, but before that, they were brown.?
There really are strong hints of the Shee as interstellar travellers. But then, in our real world, there are also "memories" of their existence. Yet, they are not actually real outside those stories! So what does this say about the Gondwanaland hypothesis?
It's maddening.
--- On Thu, 1/6/11, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Another (Possibly Weak) Theory
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Date: Thursday, January 6, 2011, 4:39 PM

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Lee Berman <severiansola at hotmail.com> wrote:

> A very good theory, in my opinion. I think David S. must agree since
> he suggested something similar recently.

David: If you did, I missed it; I've been skimming a lot recently. My apologies.


> My contribution to plump it out would be this: Many have noted the
> similarities between Shadow Children and Inhumi.

Shapechangers from the green planet, yes.


> In the earlier days of vampire myths, the lamia (deriveed
> from Lillith/Jahi myths). were associated as much with
> child-stealing as with blood sucking. Faeries (and kelpies
> and other Wolfe references) are also known for child-stealing.

Actually, this is where it gets interesting: the faerie don't
just _steal_ children: they _replace_ them with changelings.
And so we get to at least a weak form of Veil's Hypothesis.


> (the faerie-child stealing stuff may well relate to anthropology
> ..ancient memories of H. habilus and H. erectus interactions,
> perhaps.

H'mmmm. I am extremely dubious about "racial memory"
theories, but will mull on this.

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20110106/b54ce9f6/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net