Recent human crash-landing on St Anne

Tony Ellis · 07 Jan 2011, 13:28 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: tonyellis69 at btopenworld.com (Tony Ellis)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:28:08 +0000
Subject: (urth) Recent human crash-landing on St Anne
Message-ID: <AANLkTin1qwZmt_3u=sWYgJYyHHL1+ZTRsJ3cVNcm5ean at mail.gmail.com>

(See? I can do new subject headings, if that's what people want. :-) )

Some problems with this line of reasoning.

Firstly, there *is* no recently-lost spaceship in the text. You have
to invent one out of whole cloth. Yes, you can say all records of such
a ship were conveniently lost, but you can say that about any fact
invented to support any theory. For example: I think the Annese grew
tree-circle observatories for thousands of years. We don't have any
record of them because, hey, they rotted, which Marsch actually says
is happening to the current observatory. If we can have missing recent
spaceships we can have missing ancient tree-circles.

Also, Marsch never entertains the idea of a recent crash. He's the one
actually living in this future, he knows better than us what's
feasible and what isn't. He muses that the Annese could *almost* be
the descendants of "an earlier wave of colonisation", but he never
considers that they could be the descendants of a missing ship from
the *current* wave of human colonisation. If it was possible for St
Anne to have been colonised by a ship that crashed a couple of hundred
years ago - even some ship he has never heard of - this would be the
moment for Wolfe to make him consider it. He doesn't.

And again, Dollo's Law. Taken at face value, it explains why VRT is
physically unable to hold a pen the usual way. We have the answer to a
puzzle. If we say VRT is actually an alien (who for no good reason can
only learn to hold a pen the wrong way), suddenly the evoking of
Dollo's Law needs an explanation too.

Another problem, which I think we all need to consider in constructing
5HoC theories, is that VRT is supposed to be a half-abo. He certainly
thinks he is. He has less of his mother's ability to change how he
looks, but more ability to dress himself, cook and write. If abos
breeding with humans doesn't suit your theory, sure, you can invent
reasons why he only thinks he is half-abo, but I'd put more faith in a
theory where you don't have to.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net