Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Reptiles

António Pedro Marques · 07 Jan 2011, 20:45 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ant=F3nio_Pedro_Marques?=)
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 20:45:13 +0000
Subject: (urth) Reptiles
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W49C3E9F3E2971C3F1AE77BCF0B0 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W49C3E9F3E2971C3F1AE77BCF0B0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <4D277B59.9080408 at gmail.com>

Lee Berman wrote:
> Jordon Flato:
>> But But But...does that mean the man apes of Saltus might have been MAN
>> MONKEYS!!?!??
>
> Heh. Only if they have tails. And the only way to know that is to use the ultimate arbiter
> of Wolfean factuality- cover art. 		 	   		

But what if they're secondarily tailed apes? Or tailless monkeys?

Or something descended from boulders with an ability to imitate men?

Or incarnate genies?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net