Threadtiquette

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 07 Jan 2011, 20:57 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 12:57:36 -0800
Subject: (urth) Threadtiquette
In-Reply-To: <4D277D62.9090400 at verizon.net>
References: <476532.56723.qm at web84102.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<eb1e17824129d1bb0db2461b6ea9ff24.squirrel at webmail.prismnet.com>
	<4D26691E.7090209 at verizon.net> <4D2677DA.3090100 at gmail.com>
	<1E5C602C-616B-494D-9C86-67F8DC838613 at liftingfaces.com>
	<4D270C0A.2070504 at gmail.com> <4D27143C.1040407 at verizon.net>
	<4D271A0E.2090405 at gmail.com> <4D272627.30608 at verizon.net>
	<4D2773A5.7020202 at io.com> <4D277D62.9090400 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim3xWvXvrnR1Gu8CyCMv8wGgWcgtHKEJxvbD2PC at mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:53 PM, David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net> wrote:
> So then bottom-posting is qualitatively like whispering in a common meeting
> area? This seems equally problematic. In fact, that is exactly what I don't
> like about bottom-posting.

No; it's more like waiting your turn to speak.

What it _acutally_ is, though, is respecting your audience, by helping
them to see the context in which you are writing. Contrariwise,
wholesale top-posting is telling your audients that you do not care
whether they can glerk the context of your statements.

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net