Thecla and Thea

Andrew Mason · 07 Jan 2011, 22:23 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: andrew.mason53 at googlemail.com (Andrew Mason)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 22:23:01 +0000
Subject: (urth) Thecla and Thea
Message-ID: <AANLkTinXTRw38EKr_cn74ob6vWNrO=cAiijiCkqzF2-e at mail.gmail.com>

David Stockhoff wrote:
> Brilliant!

Thank you!
>
> Of course, you have the potential problem of the khaibit offspring being
> neither legitimate nor exultant.
>
> But that sort of thing can be solved just by ignoring it---if society at
> large only cares about the nobility of the sperm, there is no problem.

Well, the mother's genes are noble. And concepts of legitimacy vary
between societies; if it's a recognised relationship (even if we don't
talk about it) the children may count as legitimate.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net