Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Truth in Fiction

David Stockhoff · 08 Jan 2011, 15:34 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 10:34:18 -0500
Subject: (urth) Truth in Fiction
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W40D1D1EEE291BDF1839317CF0C0 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W40D1D1EEE291BDF1839317CF0C0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <4D2883FA.40308 at verizon.net>


On 1/8/2011 9:49 AM, Lee Berman wrote:
>> Craig just wrote a cogent and convincing post on how ambiguity functions
>> in BOTNS and how its presence is critical to appreciating the story.
>> He's plainly right. If Severian's status (there's an adjective here I'm
>> missing and can't think of: cosmological? theological?) were as clear as
>> it is sometimes summarized, we would not be here discussing it 30 years
>> after publication.
> No argument with Craig from me. Could the missing adjective be "supernatural"? 		 	   		
>
That would cover it---thanks!


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 110108-0, 01/08/2011
Tested on: 1/8/2011 10:34:18 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software.
http://www.avast.com




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net