Recent human crash-landing on Sainte-Anneþ

António Pedro Marques · 10 Jan 2011, 18:33 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:33:10 +0000
Subject: (urth)
 =?utf-8?q?Recent_human_crash-landing_on_Sainte-Anne=C3=BE?=
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W29D83B8D0B31E75CD191C2CF0E0 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W29D83B8D0B31E75CD191C2CF0E0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <4D2B50E6.5000503 at gmail.com>

Lee Berman wrote (10-01-2011 18:05):

> I don't think we have much common ground but at least we are
> communicating that we disagree?

I'm not sure that we're communicating. Your previous message was a
reasonable exposition of the way you see things, and I tried to address what
I think were the relevant parts. I don't see that you did the same now -
'How do you propose to test predictability for a theory on fiction' is
painful to read - and I think that's a pity. So, for a while, it seemed we
were communicating, but maybe hopes were raised too high.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net