Recent human crash-landing on Sainte-Anneþ

DAVID STOCKHOFF · 10 Jan 2011, 22:09 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (DAVID STOCKHOFF)
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Subject: (urth)
 =?iso-8859-1?q?Recent_human_crash-landing_on_Sainte-Anne?=
 =?iso-8859-1?q?=FE?=
In-Reply-To: <211481.1680.qm at web161806.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <784124.73871.qm at web84105.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Where then is our Mediator? Where is our Judge? Where then is our he-who-saves, he whose b-b-bones we crush and whose b-b-blood we boil, so we too may suffer with each blow? And in our suffering win the right to see the sun---the s-s-sun, whole and b-b-blinding? 

--- On Mon, 1/10/11, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Recent human crash-landing on Sainte-Anne?
> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Date: Monday, January 10, 2011, 4:14 PM
> 
> 
> --- On Mon, 1/10/11, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > What authorities? Are you suggesting that someone
> here
> > is superior to others?
> >
> 
> The principal struck me then, such that I recoiled as if
> struck by Ferrous Mike, that the conciliator himself might
> be posting here unknown, and his divine theories completely
> ignored and scorned by the hoi polloi with their pretensions
> of liberal analysis.? 
> 
> Is not every word he speaks surely fallen from the divine
> hand of the creator?? Is not his interpretation by
> definition the highest and most corrent form, rather than
> some abstract lip service to the commonly held view of the
> general public, largely imaginary?
> 
> It is the most debased form of superstition to assume that
> we must be unaware of superiority to be influenced by it.
> 
> 
> ? ? ? 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net