Lee Berman and Hotmail
Jeff Wilson · 10 Jan 2011, 23:12
· from 2011-January.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: jwilson at io.com (Jeff Wilson) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:12:35 -0600 Subject: (urth) Lee Berman and Hotmail In-Reply-To: <C7844B10-CCD3-41F5-921C-1B0B30813B11 at gmail.com> References: <575820.32369.qm at web84107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4D2B8556.6070008 at io.com> <C7844B10-CCD3-41F5-921C-1B0B30813B11 at gmail.com> Message-ID: <4D2B9263.2040906 at io.com> On 1/10/2011 4:28 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote: > No dia 10 de Jan de 2011, ?s 22:16, Jeff Wilson<jwilson at io.com> escreveu: > >> On 1/10/2011 4:10 PM, DAVID STOCKHOFF wrote: >>> Actually, that must have been my fault. I used plaintext like you suggested, and bottom-posted. >> >> Your observation of the correct standards does not mean Lee is free to snooze at the console. > > David actually didn't quote you, he simply included your text and added his. Maybe yahoo is to blame, as suggested. Yahoo contributes, but the sender remains ultimately responsible for the content of their messages, and a reasonable person could see that my signature ended what I contributed and what followed was David's original composiiton, for which he deserves credit and I do not. Yahoo has other attribution-mangling shortcomings that have been recently discussed in his seeing, so he gets no credit for not expecting Yahoo to be be tricky there. Quoting, threading, attributing, etc is to make it easier for people to keep track of who said what, but it doesn't relieve the people of the responsibility for what their messages say when they choose to send them. Of course people are not perfect, and I don't blame them for their unintentional mistakes, but I would like to encourage them to try some alternate arrangements that will help them avoid being visibly mistaken so often. -- Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com Computational Intelligence Laboratory - Texas A&M Texarkana < http://www.tamut.edu/CIL >
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net