Spiritual and Ecological Sucession

Lee Berman · 12 Jan 2011, 01:40 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman)
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:40:25 -0500
Subject: (urth) Spiritual and Ecological Sucession
Message-ID: <SNT123-W22370F2A48A83DA3AD7BF0CFF10 at phx.gbl>


>Gerry Quinn: Fomalhaut seems to have gone red before its time for some reason in BotNS 
>.......but there don't seem any obvious conclusions to draw from this.
 
Unless you understand the reason Sol went red before its time.
 
>On the other hand, the unnamed star around which Blue and Green orbit seems 
>to be doing fine.  I don't see where a 'cosmic cycle' fits in with regard to 
>the aging of contemporaneous stars.
 
It's because you are missing the spiritual side of the cycle.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net