Spiritual and Ecological Sucession

Gerry Quinn · 12 Jan 2011, 02:03 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerryq at indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 02:03:43 -0000
Subject: (urth) Spiritual and Ecological Sucession
References: <SNT123-W22370F2A48A83DA3AD7BF0CFF10 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <2D545F60135148A988B9F2260FD90DE7@jill>


From: "Lee Berman" <severiansola at hotmail.com>
>
>>Gerry Quinn: Fomalhaut seems to have gone red before its time for some 
>>reason in BotNS
>>.......but there don't seem any obvious conclusions to draw from this.
>
> Unless you understand the reason Sol went red before its time.

We know why.  But what has that to do with Fomalhaut?  What obvious 
conclusions can we draw?  That there is a black hole in Fomalhaut too?


>>On the other hand, the unnamed star around which Blue and Green orbit 
>>seems
>>to be doing fine.  I don't see where a 'cosmic cycle' fits in with regard 
>>to
>>the aging of contemporaneous stars.
>
> It's because you are missing the spiritual side of the cycle.

Feel free to explain how this "spiritual side of the cycle" causes Fomalhaut 
to age rapidly.

- Gerry Quinn

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net