Urth Net

← back to the conversation

The green man is a fake

António Pedro Marques · 16 Jan 2011, 22:35 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ant=F3nio_Pedro_Marques?=)
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:35:29 +0000
Subject: (urth) The green man is a fake
In-Reply-To: <F62DE84A31734BAA9E76586471608470@jill>
References: <SNT123-W358B848CDF3BEC307BB043CFF50 at phx.gbl>
	<F62DE84A31734BAA9E76586471608470@jill>
Message-ID: <4D3372B1.1020001 at gmail.com>

Gerry Quinn wrote:
> From: "Lee Berman" <severiansola at hotmail.com>
>> The amount of sunlight hitting the area of human skin is not enough
>> energty to allow
>> homeothermy and movement. And we know that the Green Man is a walker
>> through the corridors
>> of time, which requires energy approaching full stellar output.
>> Something is not right with
>> this guy.
>
> Correct about homeothermy and movement. As has been noted before, Wolfe
> is not writing hard SF, for most authors of which this would be a slight
> stumbling block.

- Who says the green man lives only on photosynthesis
- Who says the green man only uses chlorophyll-based photosynthesis (other, 
parallel pigments can make use of other wavelengths)
- Who says more intense radiation can't lead to different photosynthetic 
strategies (heck, even our plants have 3 types)
- Who says photosynthesis is the only path to autotrophy
- Who says the green man isn't engineered to be more efficient in his 
storage of energy
- Who says the green man isn't engineered to be more efficient in his usage 
of energy

(Interestingly, one corollary of your idea is that a moving, talking plant 
is an evolutionary impossibility.)

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net