Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Mystery of Ascia

Gerry Quinn · 26 Jan 2011, 01:30 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerryq at indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 01:30:48 -0000
Subject: (urth) Mystery of Ascia
References: <SNT123-W599BB220B3C48EB4610A8FCFFC0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <3C51C604C28C45FE9CDFDB5A06D15E8B@jill>


From: "Lee Berman" <severiansola at hotmail.com>
>
>>Entonio: No, they are saying that there may be different alleles which 
>>produce a
>>similar phenotype. They are  talking about expressed DNA. It's not a 
>>matter of
>>having a couple of  different bases which make no difference on the 
>>result. The coded
>>proteins may differ in structure yet not in function.
>
> I understand what you are saying but it is a different question being 
> addressed.
>
> The Wikipedia quote Gerry cited was:
>
> "a great deal of genetic variation is hidden in the form of alleles that 
> do not produce
> obvious phenotypic differences."
>
> We are talking about a principle of natural selection and evolution. 
> Natural selection
> can only act on phenotype. And if there is no "obvious difference" between 
> two phenotypes
> the difference is invisible to natural selection.

Nonsense.  Natural selection can operate on quite subtle differences, not 
just obvious ones.

- Gerry Quinn 


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net