thoughts on Nigel price's response

Peter Stephenson · 21 May 1999, 07:20 · from urth-v0027.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Peter Stephenson <pws at ibmth.df.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: (urth) thoughts on Nigel price's response
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 09:20:28 +0200
Message-ID: <urth-v0027-0009 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0027/0009.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I wrote (weeks ago):
> "Jonathan Laidlow" wrote:
> > <controversial statement>
> <long reply>

Whoa! sorry about this, our mailer seems to be stuck in another age.
Jonathan's had enough stick about this, and anyway his subsequent remarks
make it clear I'm not in any serious disagreement at all.

corncrake

--=20
Peter Stephenson <pws at ibmth.df.unipi.it>       Tel: +39 050 844536
WWW:  http://www.ifh.de/~pws/
Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net