Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Merger

Andrew Mason · 30 Jan 2011, 22:33 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: andrew.mason53 at googlemail.com (Andrew Mason)
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:33:42 +0000
Subject: (urth) Merger
Message-ID: <AANLkTim5c3MMB70qsNVK6gPpxoYXqg=6CmRNu6CfH002 at mail.gmail.com>

Gerry Quinn wrote: >
> The whole business as explained by Malrubius's aquastor doesn't make a whole
> lot of sense.
>
> (1) Why be concerned that the particular autarchs who undertook and failed
> the trial might found a dynasty? ?I don't see why a dynasty founded by them
> should be worse than a dynasty founded by some autarch who never undertook
> it.

As far as I can see, it isn't Malrubius who says the bit about
founding a dynasty; it's someone - perhaps Apheta - in _Urth_, after
the 'test' has taken place. It may relate only to 'Appian', the point
being that if he had children they would have prevented Severian,
specifically, becoming Autarch. (Are we actually ever told that Ymar
was castrated, or just left to infer it?)

I don't think it likely that this was a deception, given that it is
revealed after the main goal of the Hierogrammates' plan has already
been achieved.


 ?So was Malrubius's aquastor lying,
> perhaps not about the price of falure, but about its purpose? ?Might the
> willingness to proceed despite the risk of such consequences be part of
> Severian's trial? ?That has a certain degree of plausibility.

I think that is what we are originally led to believe, the 'dynasty'
point being revealed later. I don't think it is wholly false, but in
'Appian's' case there was also  a more specific purpose. (Since his
trial was a fake, there was no real point in using the threat to test
_him_, though of course the memory of the penalty can still be part of
the test for Severian.)
>
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net