something awful forum wolfe discussion

Adam Thornton · 31 Jan 2011, 22:31 · from 2011-January.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: adam at io.com (Adam Thornton)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:31:16 -0600
Subject: (urth) something awful forum wolfe discussion
In-Reply-To: <0039E3FE-84BA-416F-AE62-0FA9DA097B9F at butcherbaker.org>
References: <710736.46883.qm at web161815.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<E648F285-459B-424C-8B0B-2A27B2517696 at io.com>
	<0039E3FE-84BA-416F-AE62-0FA9DA097B9F at butcherbaker.org>
Message-ID: <7A4FFA7E-A2D7-4A7B-873D-D7E7DE39C8D2 at io.com>

On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Son of Witz wrote:

> I think bad fantasy art keeps more people away from the genre than bad fantasy films or books.
> I wouldn't touch D&D once I thought the art was corny.  Now I wish I'd practiced dragons and shit a bit more.

Huh.  D&D art is certainly a mixed bag...but David Trampier was astonishingly talented.  Erol Otus did an awful lot of hallucinatory fever-dream paintings that I like too.  Jim Holloway, if you're looking for slightly-cartoonish figures with a lot of eye-pleasing motion, is good.  Jeff Dee usually wasn't bad.

Sure, Sturgeon's Law still applies...but a lot of the Golden Age (say, 1977 to 1984) D&D art was really well done.

Adam

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net