grumble at wolfe comment made attached to guardianarticle

Jack Smith · 09 Feb 2011, 03:29 · from 2011-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jack.smith.1946 at gmail.com (Jack Smith)
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 22:29:53 -0500
Subject: (urth) grumble at wolfe comment made attached to guardianarticle
In-Reply-To: <1D98E2C398854830BEB19325EE3A27DE@jill>
References: <SNT123-W400DB386713A3D18B7614CCFEA0 at phx.gbl>
	<4D51DA82.6010103 at verizon.net>
	<AANLkTimQ4=4ST=cMrEf_kvvVJP7=ygPS1U=iBpDCBthx at mail.gmail.com>
	<1D98E2C398854830BEB19325EE3A27DE@jill>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik4G0iA_uaY4w4WigfOjqcrMi0DD1Aeny0Bxf3E at mail.gmail.com>

I like this explanation, but I don't think it would work.  For bodies in
orbit around a central body, the orbital period is directly proportional to
the distance or radius from the central body.  So if Green orbits in 6/7 of
a Blue year, then Green must be 6/7 of Blue's distance from the sun.  If
Blue is 90 million miles from the sun, then Green must orbit at  77 million
miles radius, which makes Green 13 million miles from Blue at closest
approach.  But we know that at conjunction the 2 planets are only 35,000
leagues (105,000 miles) apart (In Green's Jungles, ch. 15).

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Gerry Quinn <gerryq at indigo.ie> wrote:

>
> It can work if they have circular orbits that are quite close together, so
> that Green orbits their star in 6/7 of a Blue year.  Green will go around
> the star slightly faster than Blue, so that Blue is falling further and
> further behind.  After 6 Blue years, Blue will have made 6 orbits, while
> Green will have made 7 and caught up on Blue from behind.
>
> I don't know if two large planets with such similar orbital radii  would be
> stable, but anyway it would fit the conjunction schedule, and Green would be
> a bit hotter than Blue (their temperatures would also depend on atmospheric
> composition).
>
> - Gerry Quinn
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Jack Smith <jack.smith.1946 at gmail.com>
> *To:* The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 09, 2011 1:47 AM
> *Subject:* Re: (urth) grumble at wolfe comment made attached to
> guardianarticle
>
> "BTW, is there a consensus on the exact relation of the planets Blue and
> Green? Do they orbit one another as a single system, or do they orbit the
> sun on opposite sides, as do Earth and Gor?"
>
> They can't orbit each other or orbit on opposite sides of the sun because
> Blue and Green  are farther apart and then get closer at conjunction.
>  Conjunction occurs every 6 years (OBW, Ch 7), and Blue's year seems to be
> about the same as a year on the Whorl.
>
> I'm not sure how Blue and Green move to produce this conjunction.  If they
> are about the same distance from the sun but in different orbital planes,
> they could at times be closer or more distant but conjunction would occur
> twice a year.  Perhaps Blue's orbit is circular and Green's is more
> eliptical, resulting in the 6 year interval, but I haven't been able to
> figure how this would work.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>



-- 
Best wishes,
Jack
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20110208/48012638/attachment-0001.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net