Urth Net

← back to the conversation

grumble at wolfe comment made attached to guardianarticle

Jeff Wilson · 09 Feb 2011, 07:11 · from 2011-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: jwilson at io.com (Jeff Wilson)
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 01:11:26 -0600
Subject: (urth) grumble at wolfe comment made attached to guardianarticle
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik4G0iA_uaY4w4WigfOjqcrMi0DD1Aeny0Bxf3E at mail.gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W400DB386713A3D18B7614CCFEA0 at phx.gbl>	<4D51DA82.6010103 at verizon.net>	<AANLkTimQ4=4ST=cMrEf_kvvVJP7=ygPS1U=iBpDCBthx at mail.gmail.com>	<1D98E2C398854830BEB19325EE3A27DE@jill>
	<AANLkTik4G0iA_uaY4w4WigfOjqcrMi0DD1Aeny0Bxf3E at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D523E1E.1010207 at io.com>

On 2/8/2011 9:29 PM, Jack Smith wrote:
> I like this explanation, but I don't think it would work.  For bodies in
> orbit around a central body, the orbital period is directly proportional
> to the distance or radius from the central body.

Orbital period varies with the 3/2 power of the radius:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_period

-- 
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
Computational Intelligence Laboratory - Texas A&M Texarkana
< http://www.tamut.edu/CIL >

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net