First Exodus theory revised

António Pedro Marques · 11 Feb 2011, 01:24 · from 2011-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ant=F3nio_Pedro_Marques?=)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:24:21 +0000
Subject: (urth) First Exodus theory revised
In-Reply-To: <0F10FB8FCE0E4836800BBD61FC7F65D8@jill>
References: <mailman.116627.1297309511.2737.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>	<SNT136-w2515F8BDEFC90B6027E5AB92EC0 at phx.gbl>
	<0F10FB8FCE0E4836800BBD61FC7F65D8@jill>
Message-ID: <4D548FC5.9020206 at gmail.com>

Gerry Quinn wrote:
> We also have the issue that Kypris's instincts regarding Silk seem other
>  than parental.  Now we can allow the Gods a certain license in such
> matters if we have to, but all the same it is an argument against the
> theory.

I don't think it is an argument either for or against. The gods are strange
enough that nothing can be concluded from it, and incest is not at all
unexpected in this context, even historically among humans.

If Silk isn't Typhon and Kypris's son, then there are no candidates for his 
parents. (This has nothing to do with the question of Kypris being Mamelta 
or not.)

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net