First Exodus theory revised

Marc Aramini · 11 Feb 2011, 07:53 · from 2011-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: marcaramini at yahoo.com (Marc Aramini)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:53:49 -0800 (PST)
Subject: (urth) First Exodus theory revised
In-Reply-To: <4939DCD6E83F4B6996F3362F9792A9C0@jill>
Message-ID: <751839.46221.qm at web161815.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>

--- On Thu, 2/10/11, Gerry Quinn <gerryq at indigo.ie> wrote:

>> For the moment I see no very good alternative to the theory
> that he was an engineered embryo whose parentage is both
> unknown and irrelevant.
> 
> - Gerry 

But it SHOWS four parents to us, and Silk recognizes them to some degree, and says he found out the truth of how he came to be in the tunnels, and it outright says in his visions his mother is Kypris.  Its just ignoring a whole lot of stuff to say its unkown. :(  Why show us four parents?  Sorry, did not want to respond to this but I just had to.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net