First Exodus theory revised

Gerry Quinn · 11 Feb 2011, 14:26 · from 2011-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerryq at indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:26:32 -0000
Subject: (urth) First Exodus theory revised
References: <AANLkTinW-GRDENXaoaqfmrU3yPN8JXEF2+SjtuP0SRHE at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1769AE2479924BDB918BFBABC0AB9B67@jill>


From: "Andrew Mason" <andrew.mason53 at googlemail.com>
> Antronio Pedro Marquez wrote:
>>
>> If Silk isn't Typhon and Kypris's son, then there are no candidates for 
>> his
>> parents. (This has nothing to do with the question of Kypris being 
>> Mamelta
>> or not.)
>>
> Mamelta may be his mother without being Kypris.
>
> This is consistent with Typhon being his father, if he is the result
> of in vitro fertilisation (which is what the only actual statement we
> have about the origin of the embryos implies).

Why not Olive?  Or the dead woman in the tube across the way?

- Gerry Quinn

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net