OFF LIST Re: Wolfe and Materialism

James Wynn · 11 Feb 2011, 16:40 · from 2011-February.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:40:22 -0600
Subject: (urth) OFF LIST Re:  Wolfe and Materialism
In-Reply-To: <511300.99558.qm at web37604.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <SNT123-W540DE54F5AB3656B255952CFEF0 at phx.gbl>	<170469.38811.qm at web37603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	<AANLkTinJUQfCk79KQ1fUy_1mSQj_AXF2jXx+1NpooOpY at mail.gmail.com>
	<511300.99558.qm at web37604.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4D556676.5010108 at gmail.com>

Oops! Wrong direction, Craig.

Although, that Concept of the Mind sounds interesting, so I'm just lucky 
that way I guess.

On 2/11/2011 10:30 AM, Craig Brewer wrote:
> Lane,
>
> I'll write off line so as not to bore the rest with non-Wolfe stuff. 
> But I almost wrote my dissertation on the relationship between Spinoza 
> and Milton's materialism, with a lot of reference to other early 
> modern materialists. But I found out that a couple of others were 
> doing the same thing. There's a fascinating book by one of my 
> advisors, though, about Milton's philosophical relation to other 
> "materialist" debates of the time: Stephen Fallon's _Milton Among the 
> Philosophers: Poetry and Materialism in 17th Century England.
>
> And, years ago, I had to teach a course on Philosophy of Mind. I had 
> the same suspicions about Kim as you said. And speaking of Phil of 
> Mind, there's no better book to enrage undergraduates than Ryle's 
> _Concept of Mind_. It provides such a succinct conceptual and 
> argumentative structure for responding to any and every objection that 
> it drives them crazy when they can't get out of its circle. Been 
> awhile since I've thought about that book, so thanks for making me 
> free associate a bit!
>
> On Wolfe, though, I love this:
>
> >> The sense of redemption or of reconciliation of matter with spirit 
> is then a heroic process that runs counter to the natural inclinations 
> of things.
>
> That actually makes a fair bit of sense and is worth rethinking what's 
> going on in New Sun, I think. It's also very Miltonic, so 
> automatically like it. :)
>
> Thanks for the great post!
>
> Craig
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Lane Haygood <lhaygood at gmail.com>
> *To:* The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
> *Sent:* Fri, February 11, 2011 10:17:38 AM
> *Subject:* Re: (urth) Wolfe and Materialism
>
> The modern usage of materialist as ontological naturalist/physicalist 
> is an unfortunate hangover of a terminology shift.  Two hundred years 
> ago people that believed only in physical things would be called 
> materialists because we did not have any idea about atomic science.  
> Now we call them physicalists because "matter" seems so inadequate, 
> however they mean the same thing (unless one talks to Jaegwon Kim, who 
> is really a dualist but too scared to admit it).
> I wouldn't even call Milton's position materialism, as it sounds much 
> more like Spinoza's version of modal monism, or even something like 
> Leibniz' monadology.
> We could, of course, be approaching this from the wrong side, starting 
> with matter, when we should be starting with spirit.  A pure and 
> eternal unchanging essence (eidolon, spirit, universal soul) is a 
> common top-of-the-ontological-pyramid feature of a lot of the 
> mythic/philosophical systems Wolfe pirated for BOTNS, as well as a 
> defining feature of the ontologies of the early church fathers.
> That pure Spirit substance is then filtered or refracted or corrupted 
> as it leaves the Ain Soph Dei or whatever and gets down the lowly 
> earth-world of imperfect, temporary and flawed beings such as us, 
> where it is now instantiated not as eternal and unchanging spirit but 
> now base matter.
> The sense of redemption or of reconciliation of matter with spirit is 
> then a heroic process that runs counter to the natural inclinations of 
> things.
> LH
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Craig Brewer <cnbrewer at yahoo.com 
> <mailto:cnbrewer at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
>     Just a note that there are quite a variety of "materialisms" out
>     there. Perhaps
>     one that would be interesting to think of in relation to Wolfe
>     would be Milton.
>
>     Milton was a materialist. But he was also, obviously, not an
>     atheist. For
>     Milton, matter and spirit were on the same continuum, and spirit
>     was just
>     "refined" matter. Technically, Milton gets categorized as a
>     "monist" meaning
>     there's only one substance, rather than a dualist who says that
>     mind/soul and
>     body are two different "things."
>
>     In his theological writings, Milton says this right out, but you
>     can also get a
>     much more beautiful version in Paradise Lost (5. 469-490) when
>     Rafael explains
>     it to Adam. I'll quote it below, but I'd point out that this kind of
>     "materialism" might be interesting to think about, particularly in
>     relation to
>     the notion that, with Wolfe, mimicking something can help you
>     become that thing.
>     Perhaps, like Milton, Wolfe is saying something along the lines
>     of: "lowly
>     matter gets refined into a more spiritual state when it behaves
>     like something
>     more pure/moral/spiritual/whatever."
>
>     Rafael to Adam:
>
>
>     O Adam, one Almighty is, from whom
>     All things proceed, and up to him return,
>     If not deprav?d from good, created all
>     Such to perfection, one first matter all,
>     Indu?d with various forms, various degrees
>     Of substance, and in things that live, of life;
>     But more refin?d, more spirituous, and pure,
>     As nearer to him plac?t or nearer tending
>     Each in thir several active Spheres assign?d,
>     Till body up to spirit work, in bounds
>     Proportion?d to each kind. So from the root
>     Springs lighter the green stalk, from thence the leaves
>     More aery, last the bright consummate flow?r
>     Spirits odorous breathes: flow?rs and thir fruit
>     Man?s nourishment, by gradual scale sublim?d
>     To vital spirits aspire, to animal,
>     To intellectual, give both life and sense,
>     Fancy and understanding, whence the Soul
>     Reason receives, and reason is her being,
>     Discursive, or Intuitive; discourse
>     Is oftest yours, the latter most is ours,
>     Differing but in degree, of kind the same.
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Urth Mailing List
>     To post, write urth at urth.net <mailto:urth at urth.net>
>     Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Food fight? 
> <http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTEwOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx?link=ask&sid=396545367> 
> Enjoy some healthy debate
> in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A. 
> <http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTEwOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx?link=ask&sid=396545367> 
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20110211/2fa8a428/attachment.htm>
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net