First Exodus theory revised

Gerry Quinn · 12 Feb 2011, 15:34 · from 2011-February.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerryq at indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:34:51 -0000
Subject: (urth) First Exodus theory revised
References: <495101.59247.qm at web161804.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <374953EAD23E4848B16731AB753D22DC@jill>


From: "Marc Aramini" <marcaramini at yahoo.com>
>Your objection is always the same to the idea of Silk as an heir, people
>would recognize Pas clone, and why would Pas want leadership qualities
> to take Silk over?  BUT those have NOTHING to do with this idea, I
> maintain, Silk is JUST a son, not a clone, not meant to be taken over,
>and this is not from myth, this is purely from the text.

My objection is simply that I think the things you see as evidence have 
other, better explanations.  Silk's dreams, the vision sent him by Kypris, 
the words spoken by Mamelta - I find good clear reasons and explanations for 
all of them right there in the text.

- Gerry Quinn

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net