God and the Lizard People

Dan Parmenter · 02 Jun 1999, 15:27 · from urth-v0027.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Dan Parmenter <dan at lec.com>
Subject: (urth) God and the Lizard People
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:27:39
Message-ID: <urth-v0027-0057 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0027/0057.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

From: Michael Straight <straight at email.unc.edu>

> SPOILERS for CASE OF CONSCIENCE here.

> A.  There is no God.
> B.  The alien race is an illusion of Satan designed to deceive humanity.
> C.  God exists, but his relationship to this alien race is something
>     we don't understand.
>=20
> Everyone in the book seems to think A and B are the only two
> possibilities.  No one even considers C.  C seems so obvious and B so
> far-fetched that I was unable to believe in the characters or their
> debates.

To bring your thoughts in line with my earlier post, perhaps
hypothesis "C" is essentially Lewis's Space Trilogy.

I admit that the story is somewhat contrived, but in the context of
the experience of reading it, I have to say that it is compelling.
It's also got some great dynamics between the priest/biologist and his
"hard science" colleague with his contempt for religion and biology.
I think that Blish conveys the protaganist's thought process very
well (damn, I can't remember any of the characters' names!).

> Which reminds me of another question I have about Wolfe's Catholicism.=20
> There's a statement of his which gets quoted frequently, something like
> "I'm a practicing Catholic, but that probably tells you less about what I
> believe than you think."  I wonder if he meant that he's not entirely
> orthodox in his beliefs, or that most people's ideas about what orthodox
> Catholics believe are wrong.

I take this statement to be Wolfe's defense against those who would
dismiss him and his views out of hand, simply because he's a
Catholic.  Maybe it's a subtle way of saying that he's pro-choice.

Lex Shellac

*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net