OT: R.A. Lafferty estate sale
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 07 Mar 2011, 21:50
· from 2011-March.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:50:40 -0800 Subject: (urth) OT: R.A. Lafferty estate sale In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiny31mFNKdjqM2hgJxAkPfX5n+sHv0OF4KWDRUz at mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinCGNThotXdYC2u7q7S+vNR1LVBNrvQqrT5bih+ at mail.gmail.com> <507764.16354.qm at web161805.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <AANLkTikVHbrj9CBV=M+ig9ryBOScLR6pEA62HhayJGWF at mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTiny31mFNKdjqM2hgJxAkPfX5n+sHv0OF4KWDRUz at mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <AANLkTimZUFawFRsBCM94B+s_YmzOLBiGibBPxynOSmQO at mail.gmail.com> I dunno. With the right management, Lafferty could be the next Phil Dick. A lot of his stories -- I'm talking more about the short stories than the novels, now -- would make great movies. On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Gwern Branwen <gwern0 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote: >> Actually, what's really disgusting is that the high bid is $70K. 23 >> novels, for ghod's sake. > > Yeah, that is very high an asking fee for novels that never sold very > much. ($70k invested over the remaining ~70 years of the Lafferty > copyrights is *a lot* of money; I can't see how the Lafferty > copyrights could possibly compete. Some quick figuring with the net > present value approximations says that at 70k, to be a good > investment, the royalties/revenue would have to average like $4000 a > year every year.) > > Presumably the target audience is Lafferty fans, or those seeking > status & prestige (kind of like how Encyclopedia Britannica or the New > York Times stay afloat). > > -- > gwern > http://www.gwern.net > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > -- Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net