OT: R.A. Lafferty estate sale

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 07 Mar 2011, 22:46 · from 2011-March.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:46:45 -0800
Subject: (urth) OT: R.A. Lafferty estate sale
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikhgcCxnoN+kFh8XUxJzsY+VnO2mgosNkVbzXPX at mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinCGNThotXdYC2u7q7S+vNR1LVBNrvQqrT5bih+ at mail.gmail.com>
	<507764.16354.qm at web161805.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<AANLkTikVHbrj9CBV=M+ig9ryBOScLR6pEA62HhayJGWF at mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTiny31mFNKdjqM2hgJxAkPfX5n+sHv0OF4KWDRUz at mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimZUFawFRsBCM94B+s_YmzOLBiGibBPxynOSmQO at mail.gmail.com>
	<971FD8C2-BCFD-4C4F-B124-4AAF513F06FE at io.com>
	<AANLkTikhgcCxnoN+kFh8XUxJzsY+VnO2mgosNkVbzXPX at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimk_YPVvU3T4eHkM2Q3iSpJLbxFcT+Vk_8va7Gp at mail.gmail.com>

Somehow, I doubt that either Gaiman or Wolfe has $70K to toss around.
I could be wrong. But neither of them is in Stephen King/JK Rowling
territory.

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Daniel Petersen
<danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Somebody alert Neil Gaiman! ?I bet he'd buy this up and do something great
> with it. ?He's a huge Lafferty fan. ?He's definitely Laff's highest profile
> popularizer right now.
> -DOJP
> (Or maybe the mighty Wolfe would do it? ?He's a big fan too.)
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Adam Thornton <adam at io.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
>>
>> > I dunno. With the right management, Lafferty could be the next Phil
>> > Dick. A lot of his stories -- I'm talking more about the short stories
>> > than the novels, now -- would make great movies.
>>
>> For $70,000, it seems likely that you could publish 99-cent ebook editions
>> and probably make it back over a few years, even if you sold zero of the
>> movie rights.
>>
>> I mean, there are certainly several of the books I'd pay a buck for to
>> read on my mobile-device-of-choice. ?Spend a little on marketing to make
>> sure that blogs that people read, like, say, BoingBoing, knew about it...I
>> bet if you had buck-a-book ebooks, and got someone to announce it on
>> BoingBoing, you'd get halfway to making your money back on the first day.
>>
>> Adam
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>



-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net