Drotte-Roche mixup

entonio at gmail.com · 17 Apr 2011, 20:58 · from 2011-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (entonio at gmail.com)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:58:44 +0100
Subject: (urth) Drotte-Roche mixup
In-Reply-To: <4DAB4D50.2090204 at verizon.net>
References: <BANLkTi=GxiaEL7ie42YrMrp1K5m__eWLsQ at mail.gmail.com>
	<4DAB4D50.2090204 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <00120061-E79E-4D7F-A814-FF2550CEC901 at gmail.com>

No dia 2011/04/17, ?s 21:28, David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net>  
escreveu:

> And Tony is right that Drotte and Roche mean nothing to the reader  
> at this point, perhaps especially because the chapter might have  
> been insufficiently rewritten to make it serve as chapter 1.

I vehemently disagree. I think this kind of analysis is just what  
Wolfe as a writer has been working against since forever.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net