Drotte-Roche mixup

David Stockhoff · 18 Apr 2011, 22:49 · from 2011-April.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:49:00 -0400
Subject: (urth) Drotte-Roche mixup
In-Reply-To: <4DACBDCD.1060109 at gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=tewDTahn_u1img1+SB6HBWkFBuw at mail.gmail.com>	<4DACAA4D.6050003 at gmail.com>	<4DACBCAE.4010509 at verizon.net>
	<4DACBDCD.1060109 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4DACBFDC.3090701 at verizon.net>

I think I remember that---thanks.

I always had trouble with them anyway. If I recall, Mint is a bio, 
Marble is a chem with fleshy prostheses, and Rose was an old bio with 
metal prostheses.

On 4/18/2011 6:40 PM, James Wynn wrote:
> I think it is in Exodus of the Long Sun. There is a passage where 
> "Mint" is mistakenly says "Marble" and another in a different place 
> where "Marble" is mistakenly says "Mint". It was moderately confusing 
> since it was as though the two had momentarily switched places in the 
> story.
> J
>
> On 4/18/2011 5:35 PM, David Stockhoff wrote:
>> Which Marble/Mint mixup is that? I'm pretty sure I fell for it 
>> myself, but I don't recall where it is.
>>
>> It's certainly an understandable error.
>>
>> On 4/18/2011 5:17 PM, James Wynn wrote:
>>> When I get home, I intend to see if the Marble/Mint mix-up in the 
>>> "The Book of Long Sun" was replicated in the "Epiphany of the Long 
>>> Sun" re-release. Wolfe seemed quite annoyed by mistakes like that 
>>> when he was asked. If it is there, I will accept it as possible that 
>>> an editorial mistake like that could be considered Set In Stone and 
>>> reproduced in all subsequent volumes.
>>>
>>> If it was fixed in subsequent volumes, then I will have ask why the 
>>> Drotte/Roche error was never fixed in all the re-releases in that 
>>> last 31 years.
>>>
>>> J
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
>
> ---
> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
> Virus Database (VPS): 110418-1, 04/18/2011
> Tested on: 4/18/2011 6:41:29 PM
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 110418-1, 04/18/2011
Tested on: 4/18/2011 6:49:00 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software.
http://www.avast.com

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net