Introduction and Breath
Brian Short · 19 Apr 2011, 20:05
· from 2011-April.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: brian.short at gmail.com (Brian Short) Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:05:28 -0400 Subject: (urth) Introduction and Breath In-Reply-To: <4DADE9D2.8000303 at gmail.com> References: <BANLkTik_4w2RyPg-_cSBwYYPO68HEkA55w at mail.gmail.com> <2287.2.6.15.19.1302728897.squirrel at websecu.irit.fr> <6C450A90F88D4BA997DF9DCF98FAAF33@jill> <4DA6EFD6.5010307 at gmail.com> <526475.52363.qm at web37607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <BANLkTimqnEO1A3qTuLGdCBKAyDPTKnUaow at mail.gmail.com> <4DA881E1.1080906 at gmail.com> <BANLkTi=RCPVs0JO=DW3LJ2+vqZQX8NYHhg at mail.gmail.com> <4DAB52AB.1060203 at verizon.net> <72EC5D2EB0E842E1B97DEA81E746139A@jill> <4DADDFFA.20302 at gmail.com> <BANLkTi=JV20kEtJLhtXNSHxkMoLTHWn74A at mail.gmail.com> <4DADE9D2.8000303 at gmail.com> Message-ID: <BANLkTi=t77JP70nAuHSzoCPn-895Pxx2Tw at mail.gmail.com> Well, yes. One way to think about it is that Verbal is a liar, is aware that he's lying, and is doing it deliberately. I agree with you that most unreliable narrators don't fit into that mold. When I think of typical unreliable narrators, I think of characters that have a different way of looking at the world from me (the reader) and the rest of society, but who don't necessarily think they're different. They're damaged in some way. Severian (at least Severian Two) probably fits into this, but his aims in writing The Book of the New Sun aren't entirely clear. Thanks, -Brian On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:00 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote: > Ah okay. Then I do not believe the *strong* version to be a true definition > of an Unreliable Narrator. Verbal is merely making up most of the story. He > is "unreliable" only in the sense that he has incorporated real people into > his fabrication and possibly real events. > > An unreliable narrator generally attempts to speak the truth, but you can't > RELY on him to do so. He's wrong, misinformed, covers up inadequacies, or > has a screwed up moral code/worldview through which he interprets events. > > Wolfean unreliable narrators: > > Weer, because he excludes his culpability > VRT, because he is motivated by nature to completely disappear into Marsch > Severian, because anyone who says "I am mad" is as untrustworthy as a guy > who says "I always lie". > Latro, because of his brain damage he cannot even say himself whether > anything in his diary is true even to the question of whether HE wrote it. > Nor can he know if he was rational at the times when he converses with gods. > Bax, because he is a con-artist whom we know forged some of his letters and > he has reason to lie to his sister-in-law and probably his brother. > > > On 4/19/2011 2:24 PM, Brian Short wrote: >> >> Verbal from The Usual Suspects would be a strongly unreliable narrator >> by this definition. >> >> Thanks, >> -Brian >> >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:18 PM, James Wynn<crushtv at gmail.com> ?wrote: >> >> What then would be an example in literature of a 'strongly unreliable' >> narrator? >> >> J >> >>> On 4/17/2011 5:31 PM, Gerry Quinn wrote: >>>> >>>> For me, the term 'unreliable narator' implies that the author is telling >>>> us another, different story disguised behind the overt story the >>>> narrator is >>>> telling is; either the narrator is lying or he doesn't understand what's >>>> going on. ?I really don't think that either is the case with Severian. >>>> >>>> A narrator who simply makes mistakes or who doesn't know everything >>>> isn't >>>> unreliable in this strong sense. ?Maybe we could define 'weakly >>>> unreliable' >>>> and 'strongly unreliable' >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net >
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net