Drotte-Roche mixup
David Stockhoff · 20 Apr 2011, 22:56
· from 2011-April.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:56:06 -0400 Subject: (urth) Drotte-Roche mixup In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W48E618A7DF66E6105F652CCF930 at phx.gbl> References: <SNT123-W48E618A7DF66E6105F652CCF930 at phx.gbl> Message-ID: <4DAF6486.5070502 at verizon.net> Probably no one asked him. I'd assume each series has a couple of bloopers. If the rate of "errors" is found to be the same throughout the books, that is merely as would be predicted by the "error" hypothesis. On 4/20/2011 10:38 AM, Lee Berman wrote: > >> James Wynn: "Consequently, it is reasonable to assume that the Roche/Drotte mix-up >> could be a typo.. > > I wouldn't go so far as to say it couldn't be a typo. But one reason I lean toward Antonio's > view and why Drotte-Roche might need a somewhat higher level of typo evaluation than the Maytera > Marble example is the obvious- Severian is (self-) purported to have a perfect memory. I would > expect an author to find ways to support and/or undercut the "perfect memory" assertion in the > first few chapters. So it could be purposeful. > > Horn makes no such claim and Wolfe has openly identified the "Marble" mistake as a typo. If Drotte- > Roche was also a typo, why has he not made the same identification? It has received so much more > attention. > > Perhaps a third possibility exists..that it was originally a typo but it was not corrected, being > seen as a happy accident that served Wolfe's purposes nicely. (Does an observed but purposefully > uncorrected typo cease to be a typo?) > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net > > > --- > avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. > Virus Database (VPS): 110420-1, 04/20/2011 > Tested on: 4/20/2011 10:39:14 AM > avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software. > http://www.avast.com > > > > --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 110420-1, 04/20/2011 Tested on: 4/20/2011 6:56:07 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software. http://www.avast.com
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net