Zodiac 101
m.driussi · 23 Apr 1997, 01:19
· from urth-v0001.mbox · original
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: m.driussi at genie.com Subject: (urth) Zodiac 101 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 97 01:19:00 GMT Message-ID: <urth-v0001-0027 at digest.urth.net> X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0001/0027.shtml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Posted from URTH, a mailing list about Gene Wolfe's New Sun and other work= s] Reply: Item #3438330 from URTH at LISTS.BEST.COM@INET00# Nutria, If your Urth is "flipped" in such a way as to include Cygnus in its zodiac, then we are no longer talking about the more mundane polarity shift I thought we were talking about. Cygnus is not currently anywhere near the ecliptic (the band which the sun and all the planets "appear to move along during the year"--just the sort of "primitive" thinking astronomy still relies on, and what Wolfe was pointing out by never using "sunrise" and "sunset," for example) . . . to force it onto the ecliptic (and thereby a zodiac candidate) would appear to involve stripping a few gears of the solar system machine. (Cygnus is currently what we might call the anti-Gemini or anti-Cancer; but that sounds too permissive. !Even precession of equinox does not change the twelve zodiac signs--it only alters the seasons that the signs appear in!) At that point, having fixed Swan into a new zodiac, would it also be possible to still have Polaris as the North Star? I'm not sure, offhand--I'll let you work it out! <g> If the constellation names have changed then it is unfortunate that they didn't change into entirely new names, since I was able to find nearly all of them--under their present day names and positions, of course. <g> (Add another challenge--not only does Polaris have to be the North Star, but it also has to be called "the Octans," aka, the sorta South Star!) Astronomy is a pretty wild science, and for my money it is nowhere so head-spinning as where it relates to Earth . . . seasons . . . years. I've invested (or paid out) a lot of time looking into just this angle re: Urth/Swan, and my conclusion was--not on Urth. But I'm always willing to look at the work of others. =3Dmantis=3D
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net