do the Hierogrammates *care* about the megatherians?
Jerry Friedman · 22 May 2011, 00:52
· from 2011-May.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: jerry_friedman at yahoo.com (Jerry Friedman) Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 17:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: (urth) do the Hierogrammates *care* about the megatherians? In-Reply-To: <4DD74F67.8000504 at gmail.com> References: <SNT123-W220B7E3214FF82B9BAC2DDCF710 at phx.gbl> <AE83B76DDD3A4DCCB4C28DABF86BA1B5@jill> <4DD6C327.5090406 at gmail.com> <535089.18349.qm at web114704.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4DD6EBE4.5000407 at gmail.com> <630092.30979.qm at web114707.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4DD74F67.8000504 at gmail.com> Message-ID: <299575.42228.qm at web114711.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> > From: James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> > >> The other options are that megatherians refers to a line of human rulers >that > >> have ruled under Abaia's authority or a line of human rulers that have > >> fashioned themselves as being like Abaia or all the undersea powers. > > Is there an objection to those options? > > Yeah, but I get that its aesthetic. It's just that it still leaves open the >question "Why 17?" "Who did they rule?" We at least know something of monstrous >undersea rulers. A reference to a some unknown rulers who are vaguely related >to one of the giant beasts or all of them strikes me as random. Some people >prefer that. I don't. Like the carefully laid structures in this novel that >have been identified or are glimpsed. Okay, is there an objection to the idea that the "megatherian" human rulers were early rulers of Ascia? We don't know why 17, but if there are 17 sea creatures, we don't know why that number either. (Other than the reference to the Politburo in either case, or the speculations in my previous post.) It's true that the relation of the present "Group of 17" to these hypothetical 17 founders is vague, but so is the relation of the present "Group of 17" to the hypothetical 17 sea creatures. > >> And I think we have enough information to put the pieces together: > >> > >> There are 17 recognized "Great Beasts" who are ruling or have ruled Urth. > > Part of Urth? And what makes you say they're ruling? > > Their various territories. They rule as the Storm King rules in 'An Evil >Guest'. And Abaia has an army. Okay, that's one. > >> Why would people NOT write a history of the alien powers that have >controlled > >> and influenced life on Urth for millenia? > > Because they have no material? It seems quite possible that people know >very > > little of those undersea powers' lives. > > I think that's unlikely. The Ascians don't *have* to follow Abaia. They choose >to (or originally chose to) for rational reasons. Interesting. That never occurred to me. I always imagined that the Ascians knew no more about Abaia's life than Lovecraft's characters knew about the life stories of Yog-Sothoth and Nyarlathotep. Severian tells us, as I recall, that Abaia et al. could kill all the humans in the world but don't do so because they want to enslave everyone. This suggests the possibility that they threatened the Ascians or just the future Ascian leaders, who went along. I guess you could call that "rational reasons". The Commonwealth, however, called their bluff. Or maybe the sea creatures possessed the rulers of Ascia, as Dan'l suggested. I don't see any hint that the Ascians decided to follow Abaia because of his impressive CV. I think we'll have to disagree about what "Lives of" could mean. Jerry Friedman
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net