do the Hierogrammates care about the megatherians?

António Pedro Marques · 23 May 2011, 02:29 · from 2011-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Ant=C3=B3nio_Pedro_Marques?=)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 03:29:34 +0100
Subject: (urth) do the Hierogrammates *care* about the megatherians?
In-Reply-To: <4DD90ECE.4010607 at verizon.net>
References: <SNT123-W220B7E3214FF82B9BAC2DDCF710 at phx.gbl>
	<AE83B76DDD3A4DCCB4C28DABF86BA1B5@jill>
	<4DD6C327.5090406 at gmail.com>
	<535089.18349.qm at web114704.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
	<4DD6EBE4.5000407 at gmail.com>
	<630092.30979.qm at web114707.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
	<4DD74F67.8000504 at gmail.com>
	<299575.42228.qm at web114711.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
	<4DD90ECE.4010607 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <D41EBA66-B586-48B3-A6FD-D8B2A24475AA at gmail.com>

No dia 22/05/2011, ?s 14:25, David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net> escreveu:

> I think the whole significance of "17" is that it is not "12." It is the thematic opposite of 12. 12 is the "complete" number because it is highly divisible. 17 is "very" prime, i.e., highly indivisible

+1

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net