Wolfe's brilliance or my denseness?

James Wynn · 23 May 2011, 15:29 · from 2011-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:29:27 -0500
Subject: (urth) Wolfe's brilliance or my denseness?
In-Reply-To: <4DDA4E15.8060102 at verizon.net>
References: <B542EE90-126D-4106-9484-A3287823FC32 at gmail.com>	<594643.67958.qm at web161819.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>	<BANLkTinRLkaUs099APsHvDrTHUx9Vw7GnQ at mail.gmail.com>
	<4DDA4E15.8060102 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <4DDA7D57.4010505 at gmail.com>

Jason H. wrote:
> Wolfe is smart and clever, but I don't think the way he shows his 
> cleverness is by leaving elaborate clues at that level of 
> misdirection. At the level of tower-as-rocket, yes. But more elaborate 
> and obscured than that, I've never seen evidence for. It just doesn't 
> strike me as the kind of thing he's interested in (based on reading 
> interviews and Castle of the Otter). 

Jason,
I rather than a response, I recommend to you this essay as a starting place:
http://www.irosf.com/q/zine/article/10536

Wolfe seems to deliberately write his stories with much more back-story 
than he intends his narrators reveal or know. And the elements of that 
back-story are often not incidental.

J.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net