Wolfe's brilliance or my denseness?

António Pedro Marques · 24 May 2011, 02:04 · from 2011-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Ant=C3=B3nio_Pedro_Marques?=)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 03:04:57 +0100
Subject: (urth) Wolfe's brilliance or my denseness?
In-Reply-To: <7C1C507C20AC4DF5AFE9DB54842F857B@jill>
References: <B542EE90-126D-4106-9484-A3287823FC32 at gmail.com>
	<594643.67958.qm at web161819.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<BANLkTinRLkaUs099APsHvDrTHUx9Vw7GnQ at mail.gmail.com>
	<7C1C507C20AC4DF5AFE9DB54842F857B@jill>
Message-ID: <465CFE78-57DD-44BA-95F9-E02A1B38CF2F at gmail.com>

No dia 23/05/2011, ?s 18:01, "Gerry Quinn" <gerryq at indigo.ie> escreveu:

> Readers who embrace too carelessly the impossible may therefore find themselves thinking that Wolfe is extraordinally ambiguous, whereas readers who dismiss too easily the unlikely may find them lacking in solutions.

+1 (I'm a dense reader myself, so I'm not implying my reading is the best)

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net