Chronology

DAVID STOCKHOFF · 26 May 2011, 15:56 · from 2011-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (DAVID STOCKHOFF)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 08:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) Chronology
In-Reply-To: <4DDE7266.408 at irit.fr>
Message-ID: <79783.48642.qm at web84105.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Rudolf?

--- On Thu, 5/26/11, Sergei SOLOVIEV <soloviev at irit.fr> wrote:

> From: Sergei SOLOVIEV <soloviev at irit.fr>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Chronology
> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>, urth at urth.net
> Date: Thursday, May 26, 2011, 11:31 AM
If we take the empires in our own
> recent past - destroyed
> by social movements, revolutions etc. - and new states
> born, seldom
> the history of the Empire is studied, rather rejected
> (except maybe in the state that feels itself
> its successor). Take British Empire, queen Victoria and
> India. Or Austro-Hungarian
> Empire - its history is studied in Austria but not much by
> Tcheks or Hungarians.
> Who was their last Emperor? Do you remember?
> 
> Best
> 
> Sergei
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net