Chronology

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 26 May 2011, 17:36 · from 2011-May.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:36:55 -0700
Subject: (urth) Chronology
In-Reply-To: <38BF3918-85B7-49C3-AC7D-273A4456357A at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W4324BB24C7A5AEB30CB4CCF770 at phx.gbl>
	<CBB9F7B1E6F145438A11C4FC756D5528@jill>
	<448B93E6-0D64-4A6F-8BBE-4CB41B39E0F4 at liftingfaces.com>
	<38BF3918-85B7-49C3-AC7D-273A4456357A at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikKn1P_ewerSoojV34ubXVfs9V==Q at mail.gmail.com>

2011/5/26 Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>:
> No dia 26/05/2011, ?s 16:45, Ryan Dunn <ryan at liftingfaces.com> escreveu:
>> On May 26, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps Wolfe underestimated how hard readers would pluck at the threads.
>>
>>
>> I'm really not sure if there exists a more succinct summarization of the legend of Wolfe than in the above quotation.
>
> I don't like it. I think it's true, but that it applies to more contrived speculation. Then the problem is that each one will have their idea of what's contrived, rightfully or not.

"I do not like it. There are too many notes."

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net