Phanes
Lee Berman · 28 May 2011, 07:18
· from 2011-May.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 03:18:46 -0400 Subject: (urth) Phanes Message-ID: <SNT123-W35F9DD33291ADE03B5100DCF790 at phx.gbl> >Nick Lee: Severian is bisexual in the sense that he has two sexes -- his own, male; >and Thecla's, female. That is the literaal meaning of "bisexual." Sorry for >the confusion. I could have used "androgynous," but that is similarly >polysemantic. I thought the meaning would be clear to anyone who had read >New Sun. Oh, you meant Thecla. Got it. In UotNS she has all but faded, so in my broad concept of Severian, I don't consider her as important a part of him as the middle three books of BotNS would suggest. But she is right there, intertwined, for 3/5 of the story. I'd say "bisexual" has a meaning in modern English which is not ambiguous (dual sexual orientation/attraction) and not what you meant. Also "androgynous"with its implication of ambiguity would not have been the correct term either. Some might say "sex" and "gender" are perfect synonyms but I think there are shades of difference; sex referring more specifically referring to the physical/genital, while gender is used more in referring to mental differences. So, I propose "bi-gender" as the best term to describe Severian/Thecla's condition. >Dionysus appears in Peace as Alden Dennis Weer. I do not mean this literally. Dennis derives >from Dionysus, and Weer himself is "resurrected"from a tree. The symbolism here is obvious. Careful. If it really was "obvious", wouldn't everyone see it? But if is clear to you, I do think that's interesting and worth reporting. Nick, I do like the start of the thesis you are building here. Some, as sergei, recently expressed, prefer to read WOlfe from a humanistic/psychological level. As I've argued in the past, I think Wolfe deliberately interweaves other levels into his stories, like the Secret House within House Absolute. These levels include the religious/mythological, the political with a hefty dose of autobiography. (I won't redundantly gush about the skill of that weaving) On the autobiographical side I'd like to note that there might be agreement that Weer, Severian and Silkhorn are among the most autobiographical characters in the Wolfe retinue (with #5 also joining in). Your thesis seems to suggest a Dionysial connection to those three characters. David Stockhoff and I have discussed the general principle of "story as universe; author as god/creator"and the possibility that Wolfe applies that principle in the Sun Series with an adjustment to "author as demiurge". I'm wondering if the gnostic recognition of the Dionysus/Pan figure as demiurge and WOlfe's auctorial self-identification could be of use to your thesis.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net