Problematic element in chronology - Red Giants
Jeff Wilson · 29 May 2011, 09:51
· from 2011-May.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: jwilson at io.com (Jeff Wilson) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 04:51:48 -0500 Subject: (urth) Problematic element in chronology - Red Giants In-Reply-To: <4DE16055.2060503 at irit.fr> References: <87E792FA008E4A679A9EFA68176C4976@jill> <4DE16055.2060503 at irit.fr> Message-ID: <4DE21734.2020601 at io.com> On 5/28/2011 3:51 PM, Sergei SOLOVIEV wrote: > Dear Gerry, > > please, have a look at Red Giants (final stage of evolution of sun-like > stars). Obviously, > the sun in the "BotNS" entered this stage - the atmosphere of the star > becomes very large > and red (the temperature drops, but the total luminosity is much > greater). This is not obvious to me. Details of shadows' boundaries and of dawn and dusk (the same thing, since they are the boundaries of the earth's shadow) are much as they are today. The solar disc might even have shrunk slightly if the "50,000 leagues" turns out to be a misinterpretation of the moon appearing larger than the sun instead of being roughly equal as they do today. > It does pose other problems, I agree. Red giant may have a diameter like > Venus orbit, > and if Urth were at the same distance as Earth, it would be burned (even > if the > temperature of the surface of the star is less). I don't know whether > Gene Wolfe > did take all this physics into account, maybe not, but I am sure he did > know > about red giants. And we are equally sure that Skuld still appears in the sky of Severian's time. > I think (I repeat myself) that GW tried to be very careful about scientific > details. Do not take for granted the idea that inside the old sun there is > a black hole. It is something that is presented as common idea in > Severian's > times, but I don't see from the text that GW himself thinks that. > I sounds "mythologically" beautiful, but it was easily accessible > information to GW > in 70-es, and even more easily later, that black hole will swallow very > quickly > all the atmosphere of the red giant. Not if it is a quantum or merely small black hole, or a swarm of several suggested by the black beans. They are too small to eat much even in the impressively dense core of the sun, but their gravitation could could disturb the sun's burn rate by supression of light element fusion via gravitational containment and/or premature instigation of heavy element fusion in an asymetrical patter, cutting down on overall energy output. It can also keep the intermediate layers disrupted so that energy transfer to the outer layers is decreased, or possibly increased then decreased. Stars are amazingly complex and contrary that way, like when supernova explosions turn out to be primed by the collapse of the core and the end of fusion there. > It would by the way be an explosive > process > that would burn everything a couple of light years around > (kind of supernova). An encounter of a real black hole > with a white fountain would be also extremely explosive - not just tides. Er, the white hole is already extremely explosive. Anything that comes out arrives at escape velocity for the entire universe, and the energy is blue-shifted accordingly. But the White Fountain is almost much smaller than the sun, with which the earth cohabitates already. -- Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com Computational Intelligence Laboratory - Texas A&M Texarkana < http://www.tamut.edu/CIL >
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net