Problematic element in chronology

pinlighter · 02 Jun 2011, 20:12 · from 2011-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: pinlighter at btconnect.com (pinlighter)
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:12:05 +0100
Subject: (urth) Problematic element in chronology
References: <87E792FA008E4A679A9EFA68176C4976@jill><4DE0BB7C.2060406 at gmail.com><919CCDA1A13748D3885C08CACA98A8FF@jill><ACEAA57F-D428-4FB2-B650-33276F9B59D8 at gmail.com><1FA299F467334EA3AB206557AEDF319A@jill><4DE4F975.7040803 at gmail.com>
	<4DE50281.6070600 at irit.fr><338FE273BF55421DAA98943A6330B0E0@jill>
	<4DE7CAA4.4010200 at irit.fr><4DE7E4B3.5030706 at io.com>
	<BANLkTi=KfkKZYfm0QvHEW23-qMhkqtm3WQ at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <022901cc2161$57e68050$4001a8c0@pc>

A good rule of thumb is Olga's prayer

g y  = c



hartshorn



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <danldo at gmail.com>
>>> with constant acceleration of 1 m/sec^2 it is needed about 50 years to 
>>> get
>>> to relativistic speed, and the same to slow down.
>>
>> I think you are off by a factor of 5 or so.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net