NPR taking suggestions for The Best Science Fiction and

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 23 Jun 2011, 15:46 · from 2011-June.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:46:27 -0700
Subject: (urth) NPR taking suggestions for The Best Science Fiction and
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=--23yv+QmDzV2QyPXscUVkSg=Kw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=--23yv+QmDzV2QyPXscUVkSg=Kw at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTimbNbP-5=Eceoefw29oHX601o50yw at mail.gmail.com>

Oops, brain fart. I meant  ... "if you haven't read New Sun."

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Andrew Mason
<andrew.mason53 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:09 PM, ?<entonio at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Ha. The Book of the Long Sun is so much better!
>
>> I agree. But is it better if you haven't read "Short Sun?" (I *think*
>> it is anyway, but I haven't experienced it in that order.)
>
> You read _Short Sun_ first? Was that not a rather puzzling experience?
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>



-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net