Urth Net

← back to the conversation

choices

Gerry Quinn · 05 Aug 2011, 16:01 · from 2011-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerry at bindweed.com (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 17:01:42 +0100
Subject: (urth) choices
References: <4E3B08D2.1040504 at irit.fr>
	<4E3B18A8.1090808 at gmail.com><92DD8E0F9B754CC680D8A8E1BA5B7E46@jill>
	<4E3C0CB0.7090300 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7BB818598EEA466587192D1C0DE05A64@jill>


From: "Ant?nio Pedro Marques" <entonio at gmail.com>

> It was written:
>
>> villains
>
> Time for another query. Who are your favourite arch-villains? I mean, 
> those who really rejoice in their villainy? Almost cartoonishly? (cartoon 
> villains don't count)

Is rejoicing in one's villainy really a necessary characteristic of a good 
villain?  It seems hard to avoid cartoonishness in such - the example that 
springs to mind is the Archimandrite in Iain M. Banks' _The Algebraist_.

My favourite villian is Casmir in Jack Vance's _Lyonesse_, but he doesn't 
really rejoice in his villainy, and would probably find arguments to justify 
all his actions.

- Gerry Quinn 


An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net